ozzie,
Stephen, for a while, was a fairly regular poster here on JWD during those heady days when the WTS was being exposed for its 'big lie'.
I joined JWD after that excitement had passed, but I read all his posts and emailed him for clarification of a couple of points he raised. He replied very fully and we had an extended exchange of emails for a few weeks. it turned out we knew some folks in common.
Incidentally (and I'm going from memory here, so this may well be wrong!), in one of his posts here on JWD I think he was none too complimentary of the truthfulness of Paul Gillies, London Bethel's official spokesman!
It would be really great to 'hear' from him again.
I've just checked and he's still writing for The Guardian, so you should still be able to contact him on his old email address.
Ian,
IT, Stephen doesn't anywhere say he's now an atheist.
You're quite right, not explicitly, but I came to that conclusion because:
- he wrote the article for New Humanist, an atheist magazine;
- while he says he still 'regards himself' as a Catholic, that doesn't mean he's practicing;
- he wrote, "What faith I had, I’ve lost, I am afraid – I’ve seen too much, too close."
Maybe it was just the way I read the piece. I certainly wouldn't come to blows with you if you arrived at a different conclusion!
He actually says he still considers himself a Catholic.
Yes ... ?! So ... ?!
Since when is being a Catholic and an atheist incompatible ... ?!
Or am I getting mixed up with Anglicans again?
besty,
Happy days.
Never was a truer word(s) spoken in jest!